The Porter Curve

Michael Porter has suggested three generic competitive strategies: cost leadership, differentiation and focus strategy (see Part 1). Each strategy is designed to secure a long-term sustainable advantage in a competitive market, and each attempts to pursue that goal in quite distinctive ways.

The justification for this positioning can be understood after recognizing the U-shape effect that is observed in the behaviour of profitability of firms competing in some industrial sectors.

This concept suggests a number of possible relationships between market share and profitability. According to the U-shaped curve depicted, a company can attain a relatively high return on investment (ROI) by going after the leading market share in its industry.

If the firm cannot achieve a high a level of sales, two alternatives are open: (1) one is to choose unique differentiation, so the firm can enjoy a price-premium because of the special characters of its products, (2) the other is to focusing on a specialized but profitable niche within the industry.

The worst situation is the lower end of the U-curve with no cost advantage and no distinctive value of offer.

Previous page Next page
Strategic Decision Making Aids
The information on this page may not be reproduced, republished or mirrored on another webpage or website.
Copyright 1998-2014